| Page 2
In Harlow it was very different. Instead of using an artist to work
with architects to attempt an integration of art and architecture,
the Harlow Arts Trust (6) was set up in 1953 to purchase
sculptures to place around the town. Works by Henry Moore,
Barbara Hepworth and Lynn Chadwick were among the first to be
acquired and these, along with subsequent acquisitions and
commissions, were placed in residential and town centre locations.
This policy could be described as turning the streets and squares
of the town into a museum for the enjoyment of art for its own
sake, unrelated in any way to the environment or culture into
which it was placed. Richard Cork considers that, 'The weakness
of such an approach lies however in its failure to develop a more
integral accord between the art-works and the townscape they are
intended to enliven.' (7) Some artists, commissioned to make
sculptures, did attempt to relate them to specific sites. Ralph
Brown's 'Meat Porters,' in the markets area of the town, is a good
example of this but the work remains traditionally plinth-bound.
Seventy years before Rodin had fought with the city council of
Calais to have his commissioned sculpture, "The Burghers of
Calais," placed on the ground. He failed and today the sculpture
sits on a plinth, as does the cast next to the Houses of Parliament
in London. However a visit to the Rodin Museum in Paris reveals
the work as Rodin had intended - on the ground, slightly larger
than life size its powerful expressiveness overwhelming the
viewer with its very proximity. Harlow's policy of purchasing and
placing sculpture was in keeping with current practices in other
western towns and cities. The purchase of a sculpture by Henry
Moore for placing outside a new building, both here and abroad,
seemed to become an ubiquitous imperative. There were also
some commissions to artists to produce new sculptures though
rarely did the resulting works bear any strong association with
their locations. This gave rise to a number of derogatory terms for
these works such as, 'parachute art', 'plonk art', 'the turd in the
plaza' and 'cultural shrubbery.' The thinking and practice of many
artists had begun to change and notions such as 'site-specificity'
and 'the context is half the work' had begun to affect art practice.
Artists objected to the limitations of the traditional commissioned
sculpture and demanded opportunities to integrate their work
more fully, not only as part of the physical environment, but also,
and perhaps more critically, as part of the social and cultural
environment in which the works were to exist.
It was in this climate of change that I wrote to several old and
new towns in Scotland suggesting that they might employ me as
their artist. I did not yet know of Pasmore's work but I had heard
that the new towns of Skelmersdale and Cumbernauld had
engaged artists and that artists were working for the London
County Council Housing Department. I did not write to Glenrothes
but serendipity played a part as the Chief Architect, Merlyn
Williams and his deputy, John Coghill, had decided that the town,
with one or two major commissions already in place, should have
an artist of its own. The post was advertised in the national press,
interviews were held and I was appointed in September 1968. I
moved to the town and decided to rent a council house in order to
experience new town living at first hand. I joined the Planning
Department and set up my studio in the Direct Labour workshops
among the joiners, plumbers, bricklayers, etc. Later I became a
member of UCATT, the building workers' union.
As an artist I had already developed what could be described as a
'contextual' practice. This was reinforced by working in Nigeria
for four years which had sensitised me to the notion of cultural
imperialism. I certainly wanted to contribute as an artist to the
developing built environment of the town but was also concerned
to create opportunities for other townspeople to do so as well.
Mark1 new towns were mostly built on greenfield sites and the
citizenry had been imported. Thus new communities were
struggling to form with little shared history and tradition and
often with broken extended-family relationships. Glenrothes was
little different and it seemed to me that one of the areas in which
an artist could operate was in creating memorable landmarks
within the fairly uniform, Radburn-type, housing areas and the
incorporation of 'marks', however small, by local people. I
organised groups of primary school children into modeling in
relief their own individual ceramic tiles and signing them on the
front. These were then fired and cemented onto walls adjacent to
their local play areas. Secondary school pupils and adults painted
murals and participated in other art projects. On one occasion I
contrived, with some necessary subterfuge, a situation in which
tenants were able to choose the colours of their own front doors;
an unprecedented act at the time.
|